Malawi vs Sudan: Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing)

Malawi
232,416 million SLC
in 2023
Sudan
264,582 million SLC
in 2022
Malawi rank
38th
Sudan rank
36th

Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) over time

  • Malawi
  • Sudan
0100.0k200.0k300.0k199520092023

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 264,582 million SLC against 232,416 million SLC in Malawi, a difference of 32,166 million SLC.

That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Malawi ahead.

Malawi ranks 38th and Sudan ranks 36th of 181 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 2 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 9,484 million SLC 4,472 million SLC 5,012 million SLC Malawi
2010s 49,712 million SLC 15,012 million SLC 34,699 million SLC Malawi
2020s 148,170 million SLC 153,130 million SLC 4,960 million SLC Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (agriculture, forestry and fishing), Malawi or Sudan?
Sudan, at 264,582 million SLC against 232,416 million SLC in Malawi as of 2022.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (agriculture, forestry and fishing) between Malawi and Sudan?
32,166 million SLC, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sudan?
15 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
How do Malawi and Sudan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (agriculture, forestry and fishing)?
Malawi ranks 38th and Sudan ranks 36th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Sudan: Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local/malawi/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-agriculture-forestry-and-fishing-value-standard-local/malawi/sudan/">Malawi vs Sudan: Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross Fixed Capital Formation (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing) — Value Standard Local Currency
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
194 places, 5,531 data points, 1995–2023
Last refreshed

As part of the FAO Agriculture Capital Stock (ACS) database, the Statistics Division of FAO publishes country-by-country data on physical investment in agriculture, forestry and fishing as measured by the System of National Accounts (SNA) concept of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF). Additional variables included in the ACS are Net and Gross Capital Stock, Consumption of Fixed Capital, the Agriculture Investment ratio, and the Gross Fixed Capital Formation Agriculture Orientation Index. The FAO Agriculture Capital Stock Database is an analytical database: whenever available, the database integrates official National Accounts data harvested from the UNSD National Accounts Main Aggregates Database (UNSD AMA) and the OECD Annual National Accounts Database (OECD ANA). The database is further supplemented by OECD Structural Analysis database (OECD STAN) and, in a few cases, data from country’s statistics websites. If the full set of official data is not available for any specific country, imputation methods are applied to obtain estimates over the complete time series. Many data points in ACS are estimated and are flagged as such; they do not represent official submissions by Member Countries. With a view of producing internationally comparable net capital stock estimates, the Perpetual Inventory Method (PIM) with a constant geometric depreciation rate is employed to impute missing data. The Perpetual Inventory Method is a well-established economic model to calculate Net Capital Stocks (NCS) and Consumption of Fixed Capital (CFC) from time series of Gross Fixed Capital Formation (GFCF). Specifically, annual measures of the NCS are obtained from cumulating historical series on physical investment flows and deducting the part of assets that are depreciated (the Consumption of Fixed Capital that occurs in every period). In order to implement the PIM, long time series on aggregate GFCF in agriculture, forestry and fishing is required.An attempt is made to rely as much as possible on National Accounts data published by the OECD and UNSD. When country data are partially or fully missing, econometric techniques to impute missing observations are employed. Depending on the pattern of data missingness for the countries, different imputation methods are applied (from among the ARIMAX, PANEL regression, and OLS approaches) for the data series from 1995 to 2022. The values of Agriculture Capital Stock related indicators for 2023, including Agriculture Investment Ratio, Agriculture Orientation Index, Net Capital Stock, Gross Fixed Capital Formation and Consumption of Fixed Capital, are estimated using the Holt-Winters (HW) method (Cipra et al., 1995). The HW method is an exponential smoothing method for forecasting the annual values of economic variables. In this context, the HW method relies on existing (historical) values of the Agriculture Capital Stock. The predicted value is an extrapolation of the historical values to the specified target date, which extends the timeline without considering seasonality in the annual series.All data series in the database are provided both in national currencies and in US dollars as well as in current prices and constant prices with base year 2015.