Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Hardboard — Import value

Australia and New Zealand
41,122 1000 USD
in 2024
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
47,621 1000 USD
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
16th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
18th

Hardboard — Import value over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199520092024

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 47,621 1000 USD against 41,122 1000 USD in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 6,499 1000 USD.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 1.2 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 16th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 18th of 210 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 5,907 1000 USD 6,758 1000 USD 851.2 1000 USD Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 14,681 1000 USD 34,543 1000 USD 19,862 1000 USD Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 55,290 1000 USD 51,459 1000 USD 3,831 1000 USD Australia and New Zealand
2020s 45,019 1000 USD 51,991 1000 USD 6,971 1000 USD Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher hardboard — import value, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 47,621 1000 USD against 41,122 1000 USD in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in hardboard — import value between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
6,499 1000 USD, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for hardboard — import value?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 16th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 18th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Hardboard — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Hardboard — Import value. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/hardboard-import-value/australia-and-new-zealand/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/hardboard-import-value/australia-and-new-zealand/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Hardboard — Import value</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Hardboard — Import value
Unit
1000 USD
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
239 places, 6,288 data points, 1995–2024
Last refreshed

The database contains data on the production and trade in roundwood and in primary wood and paper products for all countries and territories in the world.The main types of primary forest products included in this database are roundwood, sawnwood, wood-based panels, pulp, and paper and paperboard. These products are detailed further and defined in the Joint Forest Sector Questionnaire (JFSQ) (https://www.fao.org/statistics/data-collection/forestry/en). The database contains details of the following topics: - roundwood removals (production) by coniferous and non-coniferous wood and assortments, - production and trade in industrial roundwood, sawnwood, wood-based panels, wood charcoal, pulp, paper and paperboard, and other products. More detailed information on wood products, including definitions, can be found at: https://www.fao.org/statistics/data-collection/forestry/en