Jamaica vs Panama: Heating Degree Days, per unit of GDP
Jamaica
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2010
Panama
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Jamaica rank
141st
Panama rank
138th
Heating Degree Days, per unit of GDP over time
- Jamaica
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Jamaica, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.7 times Jamaica's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Jamaica ranks 141st and Panama ranks 138th of 187 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Panama |
| 1980s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Panama |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher heating degree days, per unit of gdp, Jamaica or Panama?
- Panama, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Jamaica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in heating degree days, per unit of gdp between Jamaica and Panama?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Panama?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 1973 to 2010.
- How do Jamaica and Panama rank globally for heating degree days, per unit of gdp?
- Jamaica ranks 141st and Panama ranks 138th of 187 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Heating Degree Days, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Heating Degree Days divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.