Amapá vs Papua New Guinea: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly
Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly over time
- Amapá
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 2.24 Percentage change against -1.82 Percentage change in Amapá, a difference of 4.06 Percentage change.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Amapá's.
The two have swapped places 28 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Amapá ranks 22nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 25th of 72 groups.
Across the 8 decades both report, Amapá averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Amapá | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | -0.726 Percentage change | 0.114 Percentage change | 0.84 Percentage change | Papua New Guinea |
| 1960s | 0.5831 Percentage change | -0.3475 Percentage change | 0.9306 Percentage change | Amapá |
| 1970s | 6.21 Percentage change | 0.5256 Percentage change | 5.68 Percentage change | Amapá |
| 1980s | 2.91 Percentage change | 0.222 Percentage change | 2.69 Percentage change | Amapá |
| 1990s | -1.54 Percentage change | -1 Percentage change | 0.5398 Percentage change | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | -1.53 Percentage change | 0.2556 Percentage change | 1.78 Percentage change | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | -0.8643 Percentage change | 1.45 Percentage change | 2.32 Percentage change | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.5162 Percentage change | 1.7 Percentage change | 1.18 Percentage change | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly, Amapá or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 2.24 Percentage change against -1.82 Percentage change in Amapá as of 2025.
- What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly between Amapá and Papua New Guinea?
- 4.06 Percentage change, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Amapá and Papua New Guinea?
- 76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
- How do Amapá and Papua New Guinea rank globally for historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly?
- Amapá ranks 22nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 25th of 72 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org