Brazil vs Richmond - Tweed: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly
Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly over time
- Brazil
- Richmond - Tweed
How they compare
Richmond - Tweed currently reports 6.21 Percentage change against -8.24 Percentage change in Brazil, a difference of 14.45 Percentage change.
The two have swapped places 42 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Richmond - Tweed ahead.
Brazil ranks 131st and Richmond - Tweed ranks 128th of 168 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 6 and Richmond - Tweed in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Richmond - Tweed | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | -2.75 Percentage change | -5.89 Percentage change | 3.14 Percentage change | Brazil |
| 1960s | -4 Percentage change | -6.76 Percentage change | 2.77 Percentage change | Brazil |
| 1970s | 1.22 Percentage change | 1.05 Percentage change | 0.1671 Percentage change | Brazil |
| 1980s | 1.53 Percentage change | 1.48 Percentage change | 0.058 Percentage change | Brazil |
| 1990s | 0.347 Percentage change | -0.1068 Percentage change | 0.4538 Percentage change | Brazil |
| 2000s | -1.52 Percentage change | -3.76 Percentage change | 2.24 Percentage change | Brazil |
| 2010s | -4.06 Percentage change | 0.1733 Percentage change | 4.23 Percentage change | Richmond - Tweed |
| 2020s | -8.03 Percentage change | 4.41 Percentage change | 12.44 Percentage change | Richmond - Tweed |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly, Brazil or Richmond - Tweed?
- Richmond - Tweed, at 6.21 Percentage change against -8.24 Percentage change in Brazil as of 2025.
- What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly between Brazil and Richmond - Tweed?
- 14.45 Percentage change, with Richmond - Tweed ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Richmond - Tweed?
- 76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Richmond - Tweed rank globally for historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly?
- Brazil ranks 131st and Richmond - Tweed ranks 128th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org