Brisbane vs Honduras: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly
Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly over time
- Brisbane
- Honduras
How they compare
Brisbane currently reports 9.68 Percentage change against -0.9224 Percentage change in Honduras, a difference of 10.6 Percentage change.
That makes Brisbane's figure about 10.5 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 24 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Brisbane ahead.
Brisbane ranks 57th and Honduras ranks 54th of 2960 regions.
Across the 8 decades both report, Brisbane averaged higher in 4 and Honduras in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brisbane | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | -3.25 Percentage change | 1.56 Percentage change | 4.81 Percentage change | Honduras |
| 1960s | -4.5 Percentage change | 2.74 Percentage change | 7.25 Percentage change | Honduras |
| 1970s | 2.76 Percentage change | 0.5901 Percentage change | 2.17 Percentage change | Brisbane |
| 1980s | 2.64 Percentage change | 0.3424 Percentage change | 2.3 Percentage change | Brisbane |
| 1990s | 0.6328 Percentage change | -0.64 Percentage change | 1.27 Percentage change | Brisbane |
| 2000s | -5.23 Percentage change | -0.3505 Percentage change | 4.88 Percentage change | Honduras |
| 2010s | -0.7237 Percentage change | 0.3257 Percentage change | 1.05 Percentage change | Honduras |
| 2020s | 5.67 Percentage change | -1.57 Percentage change | 7.24 Percentage change | Brisbane |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly, Brisbane or Honduras?
- Brisbane, at 9.68 Percentage change against -0.9224 Percentage change in Honduras as of 2025.
- What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly between Brisbane and Honduras?
- 10.6 Percentage change, with Brisbane ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brisbane and Honduras?
- 76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
- How do Brisbane and Honduras rank globally for historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly?
- Brisbane ranks 57th and Honduras ranks 54th of 2960 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org