Burundi vs Padua: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly
Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly over time
- Burundi
- Padua
How they compare
Padua currently reports 7.51 Percentage change against -3.95 Percentage change in Burundi, a difference of 11.46 Percentage change.
That makes Padua's figure about 1.9 times Burundi's.
The two have swapped places 29 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 90th and Padua ranks 92nd of 168 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Padua in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Padua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | -0.2544 Percentage change | 3.19 Percentage change | 3.44 Percentage change | Padua |
| 1960s | 2.76 Percentage change | 5.09 Percentage change | 2.33 Percentage change | Padua |
| 1970s | 2.98 Percentage change | 9.87 Percentage change | 6.88 Percentage change | Padua |
| 1980s | 2.89 Percentage change | 1.62 Percentage change | 1.27 Percentage change | Burundi |
| 1990s | -0.2484 Percentage change | -2.82 Percentage change | 2.57 Percentage change | Burundi |
| 2000s | -1.92 Percentage change | 0.7405 Percentage change | 2.66 Percentage change | Padua |
| 2010s | 1.32 Percentage change | 2.97 Percentage change | 1.65 Percentage change | Padua |
| 2020s | -0.1926 Percentage change | 0.354 Percentage change | 0.5466 Percentage change | Padua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly, Burundi or Padua?
- Padua, at 7.51 Percentage change against -3.95 Percentage change in Burundi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly between Burundi and Padua?
- 11.46 Percentage change, with Padua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Padua?
- 76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
- How do Burundi and Padua rank globally for historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly?
- Burundi ranks 90th and Padua ranks 92nd of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org