Kansai region vs Shikoku: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly

Kansai region
-7.82 Percentage change
in 2025
Shikoku
-7.76 Percentage change
in 2025
Kansai region rank
2531st
Shikoku rank
2521st

Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly over time

  • Kansai region
  • Shikoku
-10-505195019872025

How they compare

Shikoku currently reports -7.76 Percentage change against -7.82 Percentage change in Kansai region, a difference of 0.06 Percentage change.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Kansai region ahead.

Kansai region ranks 2531st and Shikoku ranks 2521st of 2960 regions.

Across the 8 decades both report, Kansai region averaged higher in 6 and Shikoku in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kansai region Shikoku Difference Ahead
1950s 1.6 Percentage change 0.3215 Percentage change 1.28 Percentage change Kansai region
1960s 1.17 Percentage change 0.6209 Percentage change 0.552 Percentage change Kansai region
1970s 2.01 Percentage change 1.23 Percentage change 0.7726 Percentage change Kansai region
1980s -0.3157 Percentage change -0.0532 Percentage change 0.2626 Percentage change Shikoku
1990s -0.1856 Percentage change -0.3886 Percentage change 0.2029 Percentage change Kansai region
2000s 1.04 Percentage change 0.8313 Percentage change 0.2083 Percentage change Kansai region
2010s 0.1961 Percentage change 0.4798 Percentage change 0.2837 Percentage change Shikoku
2020s -1.22 Percentage change -1.49 Percentage change 0.2771 Percentage change Kansai region

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly, Kansai region or Shikoku?
Shikoku, at -7.76 Percentage change against -7.82 Percentage change in Kansai region as of 2025.
What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly between Kansai region and Shikoku?
0.06 Percentage change, with Shikoku ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kansai region and Shikoku?
76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
How do Kansai region and Shikoku rank globally for historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly?
Kansai region ranks 2531st and Shikoku ranks 2521st of 2960 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kansai region vs Shikoku: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/historical-exposure-to-drought-cropland-soil-moisture-anomaly/kansai-region/shikoku/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/historical-exposure-to-drought-cropland-soil-moisture-anomaly/kansai-region/shikoku/">Kansai region vs Shikoku: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
3,200 places, 243,200 data points, 1950–2025
Last refreshed

The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org