Luxembourg vs Mato Grosso: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly
Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly over time
- Luxembourg
- Mato Grosso
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports -0.1872 Percentage change against -6.31 Percentage change in Mato Grosso, a difference of 6.12 Percentage change.
The two have swapped places 35 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Mato Grosso ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 44th and Mato Grosso ranks 44th of 168 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 6 and Mato Grosso in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Mato Grosso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | -0.4263 Percentage change | -1.72 Percentage change | 1.29 Percentage change | Luxembourg |
| 1960s | 1.32 Percentage change | -3.18 Percentage change | 4.5 Percentage change | Luxembourg |
| 1970s | 0.798 Percentage change | 0.8503 Percentage change | 0.0523 Percentage change | Mato Grosso |
| 1980s | 2.84 Percentage change | 1.68 Percentage change | 1.16 Percentage change | Luxembourg |
| 1990s | -2.29 Percentage change | 1.08 Percentage change | 3.37 Percentage change | Mato Grosso |
| 2000s | 0.1246 Percentage change | -2.34 Percentage change | 2.46 Percentage change | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | -2.65 Percentage change | -3.06 Percentage change | 0.4113 Percentage change | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | -0.0638 Percentage change | -8.8 Percentage change | 8.73 Percentage change | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly, Luxembourg or Mato Grosso?
- Luxembourg, at -0.1872 Percentage change against -6.31 Percentage change in Mato Grosso as of 2025.
- What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly between Luxembourg and Mato Grosso?
- 6.12 Percentage change, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Mato Grosso?
- 76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
- How do Luxembourg and Mato Grosso rank globally for historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly?
- Luxembourg ranks 44th and Mato Grosso ranks 44th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org