Malta vs Namibia: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly

Malta
-1.15 Percentage change
in 2025
Namibia
-1.14 Percentage change
in 2025
Malta rank
64th
Namibia rank
63rd

Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly over time

  • Malta
  • Namibia
-60-40-2002040195019872025

How they compare

Namibia currently reports -1.14 Percentage change against -1.15 Percentage change in Malta, a difference of 0.01 Percentage change.

The two have swapped places 31 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 64th and Namibia ranks 63rd of 209 countries.

Across the 8 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 5 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Namibia Difference Ahead
1950s 4.07 Percentage change -17.4 Percentage change 21.47 Percentage change Malta
1960s 2.84 Percentage change -4.97 Percentage change 7.8 Percentage change Malta
1970s 5.33 Percentage change -1.5 Percentage change 6.84 Percentage change Malta
1980s 1.75 Percentage change -6.87 Percentage change 8.62 Percentage change Malta
1990s -0.8643 Percentage change -1.73 Percentage change 0.8643 Percentage change Malta
2000s -0.1547 Percentage change 3.86 Percentage change 4.02 Percentage change Namibia
2010s -0.5541 Percentage change 5.46 Percentage change 6.02 Percentage change Namibia
2020s -8.58 Percentage change -3.48 Percentage change 5.1 Percentage change Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly, Malta or Namibia?
Namibia, at -1.14 Percentage change against -1.15 Percentage change in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly between Malta and Namibia?
0.01 Percentage change, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Namibia?
76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
How do Malta and Namibia rank globally for historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly?
Malta ranks 64th and Namibia ranks 63rd of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Namibia: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/historical-exposure-to-drought-cropland-soil-moisture-anomaly/malta/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/historical-exposure-to-drought-cropland-soil-moisture-anomaly/malta/namibia/">Malta vs Namibia: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
3,200 places, 243,200 data points, 1950–2025
Last refreshed

The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org