Melanesia vs Tumbes: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly
Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly over time
- Melanesia
- Tumbes
How they compare
Tumbes currently reports 2.39 Percentage change against 2.37 Percentage change in Melanesia, a difference of 0.02 Percentage change.
The two have swapped places 31 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Melanesia ahead.
Melanesia ranks 458th and Tumbes ranks 456th of 2960 countries.
Across the 8 decades both report, Melanesia averaged higher in 7 and Tumbes in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Melanesia | Tumbes | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.501 Percentage change | -9.34 Percentage change | 9.84 Percentage change | Melanesia |
| 1960s | -0.0958 Percentage change | -7.79 Percentage change | 7.69 Percentage change | Melanesia |
| 1970s | 0.9368 Percentage change | -4.86 Percentage change | 5.79 Percentage change | Melanesia |
| 1980s | 0.2138 Percentage change | -0.7934 Percentage change | 1.01 Percentage change | Melanesia |
| 1990s | -1.13 Percentage change | 3.5 Percentage change | 4.63 Percentage change | Tumbes |
| 2000s | 0.4982 Percentage change | -4.55 Percentage change | 5.05 Percentage change | Melanesia |
| 2010s | 1.34 Percentage change | -1.47 Percentage change | 2.81 Percentage change | Melanesia |
| 2020s | 1.83 Percentage change | -5.06 Percentage change | 6.9 Percentage change | Melanesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly, Melanesia or Tumbes?
- Tumbes, at 2.39 Percentage change against 2.37 Percentage change in Melanesia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly between Melanesia and Tumbes?
- 0.02 Percentage change, with Tumbes ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Melanesia and Tumbes?
- 76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
- How do Melanesia and Tumbes rank globally for historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly?
- Melanesia ranks 458th and Tumbes ranks 456th of 2960 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org