Mugla vs Trinidad and Tobago: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly

Mugla
9.49 Percentage change
in 2025
Trinidad and Tobago
-1.36 Percentage change
in 2025
Mugla rank
60th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
62nd

Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly over time

  • Mugla
  • Trinidad and Tobago
-1001020195019872025

How they compare

Mugla currently reports 9.49 Percentage change against -1.36 Percentage change in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 10.85 Percentage change.

That makes Mugla's figure about 7.0 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 32 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Mugla ahead.

Mugla ranks 60th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 62nd of 2960 regions.

Across the 8 decades both report, Mugla averaged higher in 4 and Trinidad and Tobago in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mugla Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1950s 1.8 Percentage change 2.26 Percentage change 0.4648 Percentage change Trinidad and Tobago
1960s 0.6978 Percentage change 0.4407 Percentage change 0.2571 Percentage change Mugla
1970s 3.42 Percentage change -0.5342 Percentage change 3.95 Percentage change Mugla
1980s -1.47 Percentage change 0.9097 Percentage change 2.38 Percentage change Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 1.54 Percentage change -1.08 Percentage change 2.62 Percentage change Mugla
2000s -0.2931 Percentage change 0.5008 Percentage change 0.7939 Percentage change Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 3.34 Percentage change 0.3924 Percentage change 2.94 Percentage change Mugla
2020s -1.48 Percentage change 0.8648 Percentage change 2.34 Percentage change Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly, Mugla or Trinidad and Tobago?
Mugla, at 9.49 Percentage change against -1.36 Percentage change in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly between Mugla and Trinidad and Tobago?
10.85 Percentage change, with Mugla ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mugla and Trinidad and Tobago?
76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
How do Mugla and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly?
Mugla ranks 60th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 62nd of 2960 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mugla vs Trinidad and Tobago: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/historical-exposure-to-drought-cropland-soil-moisture-anomaly/mugla-2/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/historical-exposure-to-drought-cropland-soil-moisture-anomaly/mugla-2/trinidad-and-tobago/">Mugla vs Trinidad and Tobago: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
3,200 places, 243,200 data points, 1950–2025
Last refreshed

The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org