Phthiotis vs Solomon Islands: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly

Phthiotis
9.55 Percentage change
in 2025
Solomon Islands
-0.8823 Percentage change
in 2025
Phthiotis rank
58th
Solomon Islands rank
53rd

Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly over time

  • Phthiotis
  • Solomon Islands
-1001020195019872025

How they compare

Phthiotis currently reports 9.55 Percentage change against -0.8823 Percentage change in Solomon Islands, a difference of 10.43 Percentage change.

That makes Phthiotis's figure about 10.8 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 39 times across 76 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Phthiotis ranks 58th and Solomon Islands ranks 53rd of 2960 regions.

Across the 8 decades both report, Phthiotis averaged higher in 5 and Solomon Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Phthiotis Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1950s 0.0684 Percentage change 0.3094 Percentage change 0.241 Percentage change Solomon Islands
1960s 3.01 Percentage change 1.27 Percentage change 1.74 Percentage change Phthiotis
1970s 4.56 Percentage change -0.3713 Percentage change 4.93 Percentage change Phthiotis
1980s -0.2599 Percentage change 0.0408 Percentage change 0.3007 Percentage change Solomon Islands
1990s 0.8558 Percentage change -0.7786 Percentage change 1.63 Percentage change Phthiotis
2000s -0.1925 Percentage change 0.8753 Percentage change 1.07 Percentage change Solomon Islands
2010s 1.65 Percentage change 0.4971 Percentage change 1.16 Percentage change Phthiotis
2020s 1.2 Percentage change -0.251 Percentage change 1.45 Percentage change Phthiotis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly, Phthiotis or Solomon Islands?
Phthiotis, at 9.55 Percentage change against -0.8823 Percentage change in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly between Phthiotis and Solomon Islands?
10.43 Percentage change, with Phthiotis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Phthiotis and Solomon Islands?
76 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2025.
How do Phthiotis and Solomon Islands rank globally for historical exposure to drought — cropland soil moisture anomaly?
Phthiotis ranks 58th and Solomon Islands ranks 53rd of 2960 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Phthiotis vs Solomon Islands: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/historical-exposure-to-drought-cropland-soil-moisture-anomaly/phthiotis/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/historical-exposure-to-drought-cropland-soil-moisture-anomaly/phthiotis/solomon-islands/">Phthiotis vs Solomon Islands: Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Historical exposure to drought — Cropland soil moisture anomaly
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
3,200 places, 243,200 data points, 1950–2025
Last refreshed

The dataset provides annual anomalies in land and cropland soil moisture content of the top soil layer (0 to 7 cm) compared to the reference period 1981-2010. Exposure indicators to drought have been prepared by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Please see the working paper for a more complete description of the methods. The datasets span the period 1981-2024 and is the result of the use of a variety of geospatial data sources, including the ERA5-Land averaged monthly data of volumetric soil moisture and ESA CCI land cover data. Average anomalies have been calculated for both land and cropland exposure to drought. The dataset has a global coverage on a national level; on the sub-national TL2 level (i.e. large subnational regions) results are reported for all OECD countries as well as for Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and South Africa. A number of aggregates are included: Euro area, European Union, Advanced economies, Emerging market economies, G7, G20, OECD, OECD Europe, OECD Asia Oceania, OECD Americas and the LAC region. Data source(s): Copernicus Climate Change Initiative land cover data and Copernicus Climate Data Store monthly soil moisture data based on the ERA5-Land reanalysis dataset. Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org