Austria vs Latvia: Horses — Amount excreted in manure (N content), per unit of GDP
Austria
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Latvia
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Austria rank
85th
Latvia rank
86th
Horses — Amount excreted in manure (N content), per unit of GDP over time
- Austria
- Latvia
How they compare
Austria currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 85th and Latvia ranks 86th of 143 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher horses — amount excreted in manure (n content), per unit of gdp, Austria or Latvia?
- Austria, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in horses — amount excreted in manure (n content), per unit of gdp between Austria and Latvia?
- 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Latvia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
- How do Austria and Latvia rank globally for horses — amount excreted in manure (n content), per unit of gdp?
- Austria ranks 85th and Latvia ranks 86th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Horses — Amount excreted in manure (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Horses — Amount excreted in manure (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.