Ecuador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre

Ecuador
0.2307 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.2622 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
73rd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
70th

Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Ecuador
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.2622 kg per square kilometre against 0.2307 kg per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0315 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Ecuador ranks 73rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 70th of 143 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3233 kg per square kilometre 0.2763 kg per square kilometre 0.047 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.4006 kg per square kilometre 0.1633 kg per square kilometre 0.2372 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.5213 kg per square kilometre 0.1732 kg per square kilometre 0.3482 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.7657 kg per square kilometre 0.194 kg per square kilometre 0.5718 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.6475 kg per square kilometre 0.2119 kg per square kilometre 0.4356 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.4316 kg per square kilometre 0.2433 kg per square kilometre 0.1883 kg per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.2669 kg per square kilometre 0.2591 kg per square kilometre 0.0078 kg per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre, Ecuador or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.2622 kg per square kilometre against 0.2307 kg per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in horses — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre between Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0315 kg per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for horses — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre?
Ecuador ranks 73rd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 70th of 143 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/sao-tome-and-principe/">Ecuador vs Sao Tome and Principe: Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
145 places, 8,113 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.