Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre

Mauritius
0.058 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0582 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
96th
Zimbabwe rank
95th

Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • Zimbabwe
0.010.020.030.040.050.06196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0582 kg per square kilometre against 0.058 kg per square kilometre in Mauritius, a difference of 0.0002 kg per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 96th and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 143 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 6 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0593 kg per square kilometre 0.0148 kg per square kilometre 0.0445 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 0.0591 kg per square kilometre 0.0306 kg per square kilometre 0.0285 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 0.0591 kg per square kilometre 0.0429 kg per square kilometre 0.0162 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 0.0591 kg per square kilometre 0.0502 kg per square kilometre 0.0089 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 0.0591 kg per square kilometre 0.0568 kg per square kilometre 0.0022 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 0.0591 kg per square kilometre 0.058 kg per square kilometre 0.0011 kg per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 0.0582 kg per square kilometre 0.0582 kg per square kilometre 0 kg per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0582 kg per square kilometre against 0.058 kg per square kilometre in Mauritius as of 2023.
What is the difference in horses — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
0.0002 kg per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for horses — manure applied to soils (n content), per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 96th and Zimbabwe ranks 95th of 143 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/zimbabwe/">Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
145 places, 8,113 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.