What is the difference in horses — manure applied to soils (n content), per unit of gdp between Chad and Sub-Saharan Africa?

0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Sub-Saharan Africa?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP (unit)

Chad

0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Sub-Saharan Africa

0 kg per US$ of GDP

in 2023

Chad rank

3rd

Sub-Saharan Africa rank

1st

Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP (unit) over time

Chad
Sub-Saharan Africa

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa, a difference of 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP.

That makes Chad's figure about 26.9 times Sub-Saharan Africa's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 143 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Sub-Saharan Africa	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0003 kg per US$ of GDP	Chad
1970s	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0002 kg per US$ of GDP	Chad
1980s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	Chad
1990s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	Chad
2000s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	Chad
2010s	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	Chad
2020s	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	0 kg per US$ of GDP	0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP	Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses — manure applied to soils (n content), per unit of gdp, Chad or Sub-Saharan Africa?: Chad, at 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in horses — manure applied to soils (n content), per unit of gdp between Chad and Sub-Saharan Africa?: 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Sub-Saharan Africa?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for horses — manure applied to soils (n content), per unit of gdp?: Chad ranks 3rd and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 1st of 143 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/chad/sub-saharan-africa/">Chad vs Sub-Saharan Africa: Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit: kg per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 145 places, 7,594 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.