Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Horses β€” Manure applied to soils

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
30,228 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
22,520 kg
in 2023
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of rank
87th
Zimbabwe rank
90th

Horses β€” Manure applied to soils over time

  • Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
  • Zimbabwe
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k196119922023

How they compare

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of currently reports 30,228 kg against 22,520 kg in Zimbabwe, a difference of 7,708 kg.

That makes Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of has been ahead every year.

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 163 countries.

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 598,061 kg 5,725 kg 592,336 kg Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
1970s 777,026 kg 11,828 kg 765,198 kg Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
1980s 801,402 kg 16,584 kg 784,818 kg Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
1990s 362,839 kg 19,421 kg 343,418 kg Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
2000s 308,293 kg 21,978 kg 286,315 kg Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
2010s 352,928 kg 22,431 kg 330,497 kg Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
2020s 87,444 kg 22,528 kg 64,916 kg Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses β€” manure applied to soils, Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of or Zimbabwe?
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of, at 30,228 kg against 22,520 kg in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in horses β€” manure applied to soils between Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Zimbabwe?
7,708 kg, with Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for horses β€” manure applied to soils?
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Horses β€” Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Horses β€” Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/afghanistan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/afghanistan/zimbabwe/">Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Horses β€” Manure applied to soils</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Horses β€” Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 11,993 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).