Botswana vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Horses — Manure applied to soils

Botswana
4,420 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR
3,115 kg
in 2023
Botswana rank
105th
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
107th

Horses — Manure applied to soils over time

  • Botswana
  • China, Hong Kong SAR
010.0k20.0k30.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 4,420 kg against 3,115 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 1,305 kg.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.4 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 105th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 107th of 164 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana China, Hong Kong SAR Difference Ahead
1960s 7,011 kg 999 kg 6,012 kg Botswana
1970s 10,338 kg 1,226 kg 9,112 kg Botswana
1980s 19,756 kg 1,965 kg 17,791 kg Botswana
1990s 25,894 kg 2,757 kg 23,137 kg Botswana
2000s 27,290 kg 3,047 kg 24,243 kg Botswana
2010s 22,980 kg 3,036 kg 19,945 kg Botswana
2020s 7,524 kg 3,114 kg 4,410 kg Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses — manure applied to soils, Botswana or China, Hong Kong SAR?
Botswana, at 4,420 kg against 3,115 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in horses — manure applied to soils between Botswana and China, Hong Kong SAR?
1,305 kg, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and China, Hong Kong SAR?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for horses — manure applied to soils?
Botswana ranks 105th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 107th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Horses — Manure applied to soils. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/botswana/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-n-content/botswana/china-hong-kong-sar/">Botswana vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Horses — Manure applied to soils</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Horses — Manure applied to soils (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 11,993 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).