How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Zimbabwe?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Horses: Manure applied to soils … capita volatilises

Barbados

0.0003 kg per person

in 2023

Zimbabwe

0.0003 kg per person

in 2023

Barbados rank

85th

Zimbabwe rank

86th

Horses: Manure applied to soils … capita volatilises over time

Barbados
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0003 kg per person against 0.0003 kg per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 kg per person.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.3 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 143 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0003 kg per person	0.0003 kg per person	0.0001 kg per person	Barbados
1970s	0.0003 kg per person	0.0004 kg per person	0.0001 kg per person	Zimbabwe
1980s	0.0003 kg per person	0.0004 kg per person	0.0001 kg per person	Zimbabwe
1990s	0.0003 kg per person	0.0004 kg per person	0 kg per person	Zimbabwe
2000s	0.0003 kg per person	0.0004 kg per person	0 kg per person	Zimbabwe
2010s	0.0004 kg per person	0.0003 kg per person	0 kg per person	Barbados
2020s	0.0004 kg per person	0.0003 kg per person	0.0001 kg per person	Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per, Barbados or Zimbabwe?: Barbados, at 0.0003 kg per person against 0.0003 kg per person in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in horses — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per between Barbados and Zimbabwe?: 0 kg per person, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Zimbabwe?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Zimbabwe rank globally for horses — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per?: Barbados ranks 85th and Zimbabwe ranks 86th of 143 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-capita/barbados/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-capita/barbados/zimbabwe/">Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per capita
Unit: kg per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 145 places, 8,113 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 07 October 2026

Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.