Cuba vs Malta: Horses: Manure applied … applied square kilometre volatilises

Cuba
0.6963 kg per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
0.957 kg per square kilometre
in 2017
Cuba rank
7th
Malta rank
6th

Horses: Manure applied … applied square kilometre volatilises over time

  • Cuba
  • Malta
0.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 0.957 kg per square kilometre against 0.6963 kg per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0.2607 kg per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.4 times Cuba's.

Across all 57 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 7th and Malta ranks 6th of 143 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4039 kg per square kilometre 1.57 kg per square kilometre 1.17 kg per square kilometre Malta
1970s 0.5859 kg per square kilometre 1.03 kg per square kilometre 0.4476 kg per square kilometre Malta
1980s 0.5622 kg per square kilometre 0.8243 kg per square kilometre 0.2621 kg per square kilometre Malta
1990s 0.4153 kg per square kilometre 0.8944 kg per square kilometre 0.4792 kg per square kilometre Malta
2000s 0.3572 kg per square kilometre 0.9132 kg per square kilometre 0.556 kg per square kilometre Malta
2010s 0.5716 kg per square kilometre 0.9522 kg per square kilometre 0.3807 kg per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per, Cuba or Malta?
Malta, at 0.957 kg per square kilometre against 0.6963 kg per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2017.
What is the difference in horses — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per between Cuba and Malta?
0.2607 kg per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Malta?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Cuba and Malta rank globally for horses — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per?
Cuba ranks 7th and Malta ranks 6th of 143 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Malta: Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-square-kilometre/cuba/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content-per-square-kilometre/cuba/malta/">Cuba vs Malta: Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per square kilometre
Unit
kg per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
145 places, 8,113 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.