Belgium vs Malta: Horses: Manure applied to soils … unit GDP volatilises
Belgium
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Malta
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Belgium rank
96th
Malta rank
93rd
Horses: Manure applied to soils … unit GDP volatilises over time
- Belgium
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Belgium, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.3 times Belgium's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 96th and Malta ranks 93rd of 143 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | Malta |
| 2010s | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | 0 kg per US$ of GDP | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher horses — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per, Belgium or Malta?
- Malta, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Belgium as of 2017.
- What is the difference in horses — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per between Belgium and Malta?
- 0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Malta?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Belgium and Malta rank globally for horses — manure applied to soils that volatilises (n content), per?
- Belgium ranks 96th and Malta ranks 93rd of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.