Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Burkina Faso
3,575 kg
in 2023
Zimbabwe
4,504 kg
in 2023
Burkina Faso rank
93rd
Zimbabwe rank
90th

Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 4,504 kg against 3,575 kg in Burkina Faso, a difference of 929 kg.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Burkina Faso's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 93rd and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 164 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 3,516 kg 1,145 kg 2,372 kg Burkina Faso
1970s 3,437 kg 2,366 kg 1,071 kg Burkina Faso
1980s 3,293 kg 3,317 kg 23.97 kg Zimbabwe
1990s 4,292 kg 3,884 kg 408.09 kg Burkina Faso
2000s 5,642 kg 4,396 kg 1,246 kg Burkina Faso
2010s 6,450 kg 4,486 kg 1,963 kg Burkina Faso
2020s 2,646 kg 4,506 kg 1,859 kg Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Burkina Faso or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 4,504 kg against 3,575 kg in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
What is the difference in horses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
929 kg, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burkina Faso and Zimbabwe rank globally for horses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Burkina Faso ranks 93rd and Zimbabwe ranks 90th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/burkina-faso/zimbabwe/">Burkina Faso vs Zimbabwe: Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 11,993 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).