Eswatini vs Malta: Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises

Eswatini
278.76 kg
in 2023
Malta
306.25 kg
in 2017
Eswatini rank
119th
Malta rank
118th

Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises over time

  • Eswatini
  • Malta
200300400500196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 306.25 kg against 278.76 kg in Eswatini, a difference of 27.49 kg.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Eswatini ranks 119th and Malta ranks 118th of 164 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 366.67 kg 503.08 kg 136.4 kg Malta
1970s 301.16 kg 330.73 kg 29.57 kg Malta
1980s 249.78 kg 263.78 kg 14 kg Malta
1990s 212.27 kg 286.22 kg 73.95 kg Malta
2000s 230.17 kg 292.23 kg 62.06 kg Malta
2010s 262.36 kg 304.72 kg 42.36 kg Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses — manure applied to soils that volatilises, Eswatini or Malta?
Malta, at 306.25 kg against 278.76 kg in Eswatini as of 2017.
What is the difference in horses — manure applied to soils that volatilises between Eswatini and Malta?
27.49 kg, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Malta?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Eswatini and Malta rank globally for horses — manure applied to soils that volatilises?
Eswatini ranks 119th and Malta ranks 118th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Malta: Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/eswatini/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-applied-to-soils-that-volatilises-n-content/eswatini/malta/">Eswatini vs Malta: Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Horses — Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 11,993 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).