Annex I countries vs Portugal: Horses — Manure left on pasture (N content), annual growth rate

Annex I countries
-0.0299 % change on previous year
in 2023
Portugal
2.27 % change on previous year
in 2022
Annex I countries rank
19th
Portugal rank
21st

Horses — Manure left on pasture (N content), annual growth rate over time

  • Annex I countries
  • Portugal
-200204060196219922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 2.27 % change on previous year against -0.0299 % change on previous year in Annex I countries, a difference of 2.3 % change on previous year.

That makes Portugal's figure about 76.1 times Annex I countries's.

The two have swapped places 23 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Annex I countries ahead.

Annex I countries ranks 19th and Portugal ranks 21st of 34 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Annex I countries averaged higher in 2 and Portugal in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Annex I countries Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s -2.69 % change on previous year -4.58 % change on previous year 1.89 % change on previous year Annex I countries
1970s -1.94 % change on previous year -1.27 % change on previous year 0.6681 % change on previous year Portugal
1980s -0.6082 % change on previous year -1.39 % change on previous year 0.7843 % change on previous year Annex I countries
1990s -2.15 % change on previous year 9.36 % change on previous year 11.51 % change on previous year Portugal
2000s 2.26 % change on previous year 5.5 % change on previous year 3.24 % change on previous year Portugal
2010s -3.28 % change on previous year -0.6628 % change on previous year 2.61 % change on previous year Portugal
2020s -3.34 % change on previous year 1.17 % change on previous year 4.51 % change on previous year Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses — manure left on pasture (n content), annual growth rate, Annex I countries or Portugal?
Portugal, at 2.27 % change on previous year against -0.0299 % change on previous year in Annex I countries as of 2022.
What is the difference in horses — manure left on pasture (n content), annual growth rate between Annex I countries and Portugal?
2.3 % change on previous year, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Annex I countries and Portugal?
61 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2022.
How do Annex I countries and Portugal rank globally for horses — manure left on pasture (n content), annual growth rate?
Annex I countries ranks 19th and Portugal ranks 21st of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Horses — Manure left on pasture (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Annex I countries vs Portugal: Horses — Manure left on pasture (N content), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content-annual-growth-rate/annex-i-countries/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content-annual-growth-rate/annex-i-countries/portugal/">Annex I countries vs Portugal: Horses — Manure left on pasture (N content), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Horses — Manure left on pasture (N content), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 11,689 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Horses — Manure left on pasture (N content). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.