China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: Horses — Manure left on pasture

China, Hong Kong SAR
59,183 kg
in 2023
Eswatini
68,994 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
133rd
Eswatini rank
132nd

Horses — Manure left on pasture over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Eswatini
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 68,994 kg against 59,183 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 9,811 kg.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 133rd and Eswatini ranks 132nd of 164 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 18,981 kg 90,752 kg 71,771 kg Eswatini
1970s 23,286 kg 74,536 kg 51,250 kg Eswatini
1980s 37,336 kg 61,821 kg 24,486 kg Eswatini
1990s 52,384 kg 52,536 kg 152.44 kg Eswatini
2000s 57,892 kg 56,967 kg 925.12 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 57,676 kg 65,394 kg 7,718 kg Eswatini
2020s 59,164 kg 68,390 kg 9,226 kg Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses — manure left on pasture, China, Hong Kong SAR or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 68,994 kg against 59,183 kg in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in horses — manure left on pasture between China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini?
9,811 kg, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Eswatini rank globally for horses — manure left on pasture?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 133rd and Eswatini ranks 132nd of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Horses — Manure left on pasture (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: Horses — Manure left on pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/eswatini/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Eswatini: Horses — Manure left on pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Horses — Manure left on pasture (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 11,993 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).