China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Horses — Manure left on pasture

China, Hong Kong SAR
59,183 kg
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
55,345 kg
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
133rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
135th

Horses — Manure left on pasture over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Trinidad and Tobago
20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 59,183 kg against 55,345 kg in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 3,838 kg.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 133rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 135th of 164 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 4 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 18,981 kg 39,561 kg 20,580 kg Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 23,286 kg 39,561 kg 16,275 kg Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 37,336 kg 39,561 kg 2,225 kg Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 52,384 kg 39,561 kg 12,823 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 57,892 kg 47,710 kg 10,182 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 57,676 kg 55,448 kg 2,228 kg China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 59,164 kg 55,395 kg 3,769 kg China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses — manure left on pasture, China, Hong Kong SAR or Trinidad and Tobago?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 59,183 kg against 55,345 kg in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in horses — manure left on pasture between China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago?
3,838 kg, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for horses — manure left on pasture?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 133rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 135th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Horses — Manure left on pasture (N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Horses — Manure left on pasture. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-manure-left-on-pasture-n-content/china-hong-kong-sar/trinidad-and-tobago/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Horses — Manure left on pasture</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Horses — Manure left on pasture (N content)
Unit
kg
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 11,993 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).