Belgium vs Panama: Horses — Manure management
Horses — Manure management over time
- Belgium
- Panama
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 42,127 kg against 41,356 kg in Panama, a difference of 771 kg.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Panama ahead.
Belgium ranks 79th and Panama ranks 80th of 163 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46,063 kg | 56,335 kg | 10,272 kg | Panama |
| 2010s | 47,149 kg | 45,867 kg | 1,282 kg | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher horses — manure management, Belgium or Panama?
- Belgium, at 42,127 kg against 41,356 kg in Panama as of 2017.
- What is the difference in horses — manure management between Belgium and Panama?
- 771 kg, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Panama?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Belgium and Panama rank globally for horses — manure management?
- Belgium ranks 79th and Panama ranks 80th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Horses — Manure management (manure treated, N content). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).