Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Romania: Horses — Share in total livestock

Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
1.19 %LSU
in 2023
Romania
5.81 %LSU
in 2021
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) rank
21st
Romania rank
17th

Horses — Share in total livestock over time

  • Least Developed Countries (LDCs)
  • Romania
02.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 5.81 %LSU against 1.19 %LSU in Least Developed Countries (LDCs), a difference of 4.62 %LSU.

That makes Romania's figure about 4.9 times Least Developed Countries (LDCs)'s.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 21st and Romania ranks 17th of 38 regions.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least Developed Countries (LDCs) Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 1.54 %LSU 8.01 %LSU 6.47 %LSU Romania
1970s 1.6 %LSU 4.95 %LSU 3.35 %LSU Romania
1980s 1.81 %LSU 3.92 %LSU 2.1 %LSU Romania
1990s 1.54 %LSU 7.05 %LSU 5.51 %LSU Romania
2000s 1.29 %LSU 10.35 %LSU 9.07 %LSU Romania
2010s 1.23 %LSU 7.66 %LSU 6.44 %LSU Romania
2020s 1.19 %LSU 6 %LSU 4.81 %LSU Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses — share in total livestock, Least Developed Countries (LDCs) or Romania?
Romania, at 5.81 %LSU against 1.19 %LSU in Least Developed Countries (LDCs) as of 2021.
What is the difference in horses — share in total livestock between Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Romania?
4.62 %LSU, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Romania?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2021.
How do Least Developed Countries (LDCs) and Romania rank globally for horses — share in total livestock?
Least Developed Countries (LDCs) ranks 21st and Romania ranks 17th of 38 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Horses — Share in total livestock. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Romania: Horses — Share in total livestock. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-share-in-total-livestock/least-developed-countries-ldcs/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-share-in-total-livestock/least-developed-countries-ldcs/romania/">Least Developed Countries (LDCs) vs Romania: Horses — Share in total livestock</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Horses — Share in total livestock
Unit
%LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
211 places, 11,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.