Barbados vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Horses — Stocks

Barbados
1,235 An
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR
1,559 An
in 2023
Barbados rank
139th
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
136th

Horses — Stocks over time

  • Barbados
  • China, Hong Kong SAR
5007501.0k1.2k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 1,559 An against 1,235 An in Barbados, a difference of 324 An.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.3 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 139th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 136th of 164 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and China, Hong Kong SAR in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados China, Hong Kong SAR Difference Ahead
1960s 1,000 An 500 An 500 An Barbados
1970s 1,000 An 613.4 An 386.6 An Barbados
1980s 1,000 An 983.5 An 16.5 An Barbados
1990s 1,000 An 1,380 An 379.9 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 1,135 An 1,525 An 390 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 1,246 An 1,519 An 273.6 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 1,238 An 1,558 An 320.75 An China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses — stocks, Barbados or China, Hong Kong SAR?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 1,559 An against 1,235 An in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in horses — stocks between Barbados and China, Hong Kong SAR?
324 An, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China, Hong Kong SAR?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and China, Hong Kong SAR rank globally for horses — stocks?
Barbados ranks 139th and China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 136th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Horses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Horses — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-stocks-2/barbados/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-stocks-2/barbados/china-hong-kong-sar/">Barbados vs China, Hong Kong SAR: Horses — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Horses — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 11,993 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).