China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Horses — Stocks

China, Hong Kong SAR
1,559 An
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
1,399 An
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
136th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
138th

Horses — Stocks over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Trinidad and Tobago
5007501.0k1.2k1.5k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 1,559 An against 1,399 An in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 160 An.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 136th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 138th of 164 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 4 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 500 An 1,000 An 500 An Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 613.4 An 1,000 An 386.6 An Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 983.5 An 1,000 An 16.5 An Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 1,380 An 1,000 An 379.9 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 1,525 An 1,206 An 319 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 1,519 An 1,402 An 117.7 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 1,558 An 1,400 An 158.25 An China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses — stocks, China, Hong Kong SAR or Trinidad and Tobago?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 1,559 An against 1,399 An in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in horses — stocks between China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago?
160 An, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for horses — stocks?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 136th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 138th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Horses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Horses — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-stocks-2/china-hong-kong-sar/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-stocks-2/china-hong-kong-sar/trinidad-and-tobago/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Horses — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Horses — Stocks
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
213 places, 11,993 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).