Israel vs Montenegro: Horses — Stocks
Horses — Stocks over time
- Israel
- Montenegro
How they compare
Israel currently reports 4,000 An against 3,882 An in Montenegro, a difference of 118 An.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Israel ranks 131st and Montenegro ranks 133rd of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,000 An | 5,450 An | 1,450 An | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 4,000 An | 4,405 An | 404.7 An | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 4,000 An | 3,833 An | 167.25 An | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher horses — stocks, Israel or Montenegro?
- Israel, at 4,000 An against 3,882 An in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in horses — stocks between Israel and Montenegro?
- 118 An, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Montenegro rank globally for horses — stocks?
- Israel ranks 131st and Montenegro ranks 133rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Horses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).