Lithuania vs Serbia: Horses — Stocks
Horses — Stocks over time
- Lithuania
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 14,520 An against 12,301 An in Lithuania, a difference of 2,219 An.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 114th and Serbia ranks 111th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58,451 An | 17,392 An | 41,060 An | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 26,166 An | 14,923 An | 11,243 An | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 12,596 An | 13,167 An | 570.75 An | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher horses — stocks, Lithuania or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 14,520 An against 12,301 An in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in horses — stocks between Lithuania and Serbia?
- 2,219 An, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Serbia rank globally for horses — stocks?
- Lithuania ranks 114th and Serbia ranks 111th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Horses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Livestock Manure domain of FAOSTAT contains estimates of nitrogen (N) inputs to agricultural soils from livestock manure. Data on the N losses to air and water are also disseminated. These estimates are compiled using official FAOSTAT statistics of animal stocks and by applying the internationally approved Guidelines of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Data are available by country, with global coverage and updated annually.The following elements are disseminated: 1) Stocks; 2) Amount excreted in manure (N content); 3) Manure left on pasture (N content); 4) Manure left on pasture that volatilises (N content); 5) Manure left on pasture that leaches (N content); 6) Manure treated (N content); 7) Losses from manure treated (N content); 8) Manure applied to soils (N content); 9) Manure applied to soils that volatilises (N content); 10) Manure applied to soils that leaches (N content).