Belgium vs Portugal: Horses — Stocks, per square kilometre
Belgium
0.9705 An per square kilometre
in 2017
Portugal
0.9825 An per square kilometre
in 2022
Belgium rank
39th
Portugal rank
38th
Horses — Stocks, per square kilometre over time
- Belgium
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 0.9825 An per square kilometre against 0.9705 An per square kilometre in Belgium, a difference of 0.012 An per square kilometre.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.
Belgium ranks 39th and Portugal ranks 38th of 143 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.06 An per square kilometre | 0.729 An per square kilometre | 0.3322 An per square kilometre | Belgium |
| 2010s | 1.09 An per square kilometre | 0.9007 An per square kilometre | 0.1855 An per square kilometre | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher horses — stocks, per square kilometre, Belgium or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 0.9825 An per square kilometre against 0.9705 An per square kilometre in Belgium as of 2022.
- What is the difference in horses — stocks, per square kilometre between Belgium and Portugal?
- 0.012 An per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Portugal?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Belgium and Portugal rank globally for horses — stocks, per square kilometre?
- Belgium ranks 39th and Portugal ranks 38th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Horses — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Horses — Stocks divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.