Belgium vs Slovenia: Horses — Stocks, per square kilometre
Belgium
0.9705 An per square kilometre
in 2017
Slovenia
0.966 An per square kilometre
in 2017
Belgium rank
39th
Slovenia rank
40th
Horses — Stocks, per square kilometre over time
- Belgium
- Slovenia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.9705 An per square kilometre against 0.966 An per square kilometre in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0045 An per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 39th and Slovenia ranks 40th of 143 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.06 An per square kilometre | 0.8832 An per square kilometre | 0.1779 An per square kilometre | Belgium |
| 2010s | 1.09 An per square kilometre | 1.03 An per square kilometre | 0.0528 An per square kilometre | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher horses — stocks, per square kilometre, Belgium or Slovenia?
- Belgium, at 0.9705 An per square kilometre against 0.966 An per square kilometre in Slovenia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in horses — stocks, per square kilometre between Belgium and Slovenia?
- 0.0045 An per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Slovenia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Belgium and Slovenia rank globally for horses — stocks, per square kilometre?
- Belgium ranks 39th and Slovenia ranks 40th of 143 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Horses — Stocks, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Horses — Stocks divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.