China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Horses — Stocks

China, Hong Kong SAR
1,013 LSU
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
909.35 LSU
in 2023
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
133rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
135th

Horses — Stocks over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Trinidad and Tobago
4006008001.0k196119922023

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 1,013 LSU against 909.35 LSU in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 103.65 LSU.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.1 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 133rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 135th of 164 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 4 and Trinidad and Tobago in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 325 LSU 650 LSU 325 LSU Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 398.71 LSU 650 LSU 251.29 LSU Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 639.27 LSU 650 LSU 10.73 LSU Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 896.94 LSU 650 LSU 246.94 LSU China, Hong Kong SAR
2000s 991.25 LSU 783.9 LSU 207.35 LSU China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 987.55 LSU 911.04 LSU 76.51 LSU China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 1,013 LSU 910.16 LSU 102.86 LSU China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher horses — stocks, China, Hong Kong SAR or Trinidad and Tobago?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 1,013 LSU against 909.35 LSU in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in horses — stocks between China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago?
103.65 LSU, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for horses — stocks?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 133rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 135th of 164 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Horses — Stocks. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Horses — Stocks. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-stocks/china-hong-kong-sar/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/horses-stocks/china-hong-kong-sar/trinidad-and-tobago/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Trinidad and Tobago: Horses — Stocks</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Horses — Stocks
Unit
LSU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
211 places, 11,867 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Livestock Patterns domain of FAOSTAT contains data on livestock numbers, shares of major livestock species and densities of livestock units in the agricultural land area. Values are calculated using Livestock Units (LSU), which facilitate aggregating information for different livestock types. Data are available by country, with global coverage, for the period 1961 to the most recent year available with annual updates. This methodology applies the LSU coefficients reported in the "Guidelines for the preparation of livestock sector reviews" (FAO, 2011). From this publication, LSU coefficients are computed by livestock type and by country. The reference unit used for the calculation of livestock units (=1 LSU) is the grazing equivalent of one adult dairy cow producing 3000 kg of milk annually, fed without additional concentrated foodstuffs. FAOSTAT agri-environmental indicators on livestock patterns closely follow the structure of the indicators in EUROSTAT.