Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Isle of Man: Exposure to air pollution from human sources

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
5.14 micrograms per cubic meter
in 2024
Isle of Man
5.5 micrograms per cubic meter
in 2024
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
183rd
Isle of Man rank
180th

Exposure to air pollution from human sources over time

  • Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Isle of Man
02468199820112024

How they compare

Isle of Man currently reports 5.5 micrograms per cubic meter against 5.14 micrograms per cubic meter in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, a difference of 0.36 micrograms per cubic meter.

That makes Isle of Man's figure about 1.1 times Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba's.

Across all 27 years both countries report, Isle of Man has been ahead every year.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 183rd and Isle of Man ranks 180th of 240 countries.

Isle of Man has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba Isle of Man Difference Ahead
1990s 4.47 micrograms per cubic meter 6.75 micrograms per cubic meter 2.28 micrograms per cubic meter Isle of Man
2000s 4.18 micrograms per cubic meter 6.47 micrograms per cubic meter 2.29 micrograms per cubic meter Isle of Man
2010s 4.48 micrograms per cubic meter 6.35 micrograms per cubic meter 1.87 micrograms per cubic meter Isle of Man
2020s 4.47 micrograms per cubic meter 5.41 micrograms per cubic meter 0.944 micrograms per cubic meter Isle of Man

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exposure to air pollution from human sources, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Isle of Man?
Isle of Man, at 5.5 micrograms per cubic meter against 5.14 micrograms per cubic meter in Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba as of 2024.
What is the difference in exposure to air pollution from human sources between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Isle of Man?
0.36 micrograms per cubic meter, with Isle of Man ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Isle of Man?
27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Isle of Man rank globally for exposure to air pollution from human sources?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 183rd and Isle of Man ranks 180th of 240 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago (EPIC) (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Exposure to air pollution from human sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Isle of Man: Exposure to air pollution from human sources. Statizoid, drawing on Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago (EPIC) (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/human-caused-air-pollution-exposure/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/isle-of-man/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/human-caused-air-pollution-exposure/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/isle-of-man/">Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Isle of Man: Exposure to air pollution from human sources</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exposure to air pollution from human sources
Unit
micrograms per cubic meter
Source
Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago (EPIC) (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
240 places, 6,480 data points, 1998–2024
Last refreshed

Annual population-weighted average concentration of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the air, measured in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m³). Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) are particles with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less, which can pose significant health risks. This data excludes natural sources of PM2.5, such as dust and sea salt, to focus on human-caused pollution.