Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Exposure to air pollution from human sources

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
5.14 micrograms per cubic meter
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
4.55 micrograms per cubic meter
in 2024
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba rank
183rd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
186th

Exposure to air pollution from human sources over time

  • Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
0246199820112024

How they compare

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba currently reports 5.14 micrograms per cubic meter against 4.55 micrograms per cubic meter in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.59 micrograms per cubic meter.

That makes Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 183rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 186th of 240 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 4.47 micrograms per cubic meter 5.84 micrograms per cubic meter 1.37 micrograms per cubic meter Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 4.18 micrograms per cubic meter 4.46 micrograms per cubic meter 0.28 micrograms per cubic meter Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 4.48 micrograms per cubic meter 3.85 micrograms per cubic meter 0.626 micrograms per cubic meter Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba
2020s 4.47 micrograms per cubic meter 4.2 micrograms per cubic meter 0.268 micrograms per cubic meter Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exposure to air pollution from human sources, Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba, at 5.14 micrograms per cubic meter against 4.55 micrograms per cubic meter in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in exposure to air pollution from human sources between Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.59 micrograms per cubic meter, with Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
How do Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for exposure to air pollution from human sources?
Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba ranks 183rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 186th of 240 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago (EPIC) (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Exposure to air pollution from human sources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Exposure to air pollution from human sources. Statizoid, drawing on Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago (EPIC) (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/human-caused-air-pollution-exposure/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/human-caused-air-pollution-exposure/bonaire-sint-eustatius-and-saba/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Bonaire Sint Eustatius and Saba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Exposure to air pollution from human sources</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exposure to air pollution from human sources
Unit
micrograms per cubic meter
Source
Energy Policy Institute at the University of Chicago (EPIC) (2026) – with minor processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
240 places, 6,480 data points, 1998–2024
Last refreshed

Annual population-weighted average concentration of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in the air, measured in micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m³). Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) are particles with a diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less, which can pose significant health risks. This data excludes natural sources of PM2.5, such as dust and sea salt, to focus on human-caused pollution.