Bhutan vs North Macedonia: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging over time
- Bhutan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 0.55 1000 No against 0.31 1000 No in Bhutan, a difference of 0.24 1000 No.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.8 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Bhutan ranks 52nd and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 56 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.12 1000 No | 0.63 1000 No | 0.51 1000 No | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 0.3225 1000 No | 0.515 1000 No | 0.1925 1000 No | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging, Bhutan or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 0.55 1000 No against 0.31 1000 No in Bhutan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging between Bhutan and North Macedonia?
- 0.24 1000 No, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and North Macedonia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and North Macedonia rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging?
- Bhutan ranks 52nd and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.