Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Thailand: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging

Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
3.42 1000 No
in 2024
Thailand
41.61 1000 No
in 2024
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) rank
3rd
Thailand rank
4th

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging over time

  • Bolivia (Plurinational State of)
  • Thailand
020406080201020172024

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 41.61 1000 No against 3.42 1000 No in Bolivia (Plurinational State of), a difference of 38.19 1000 No.

That makes Thailand's figure about 12.2 times Bolivia (Plurinational State of)'s.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 3rd and Thailand ranks 4th of 5 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia (Plurinational State of) Thailand Difference Ahead
2010s 2.17 1000 No 53.6 1000 No 51.44 1000 No Thailand
2020s 2.9 1000 No 45.75 1000 No 42.85 1000 No Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging, Bolivia (Plurinational State of) or Thailand?
Thailand, at 41.61 1000 No against 3.42 1000 No in Bolivia (Plurinational State of) as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging between Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Thailand?
38.19 1000 No, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Thailand?
6 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
How do Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Thailand rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging?
Bolivia (Plurinational State of) ranks 3rd and Thailand ranks 4th of 5 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging — Female — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Thailand: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-female-value/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-female-value/bolivia-plurinational-state-of/thailand/">Bolivia (Plurinational State of) vs Thailand: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging — Female — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
62 places, 863 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.