Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging

Bosnia and Herzegovina
16.09 1000 No
in 2024
Ecuador
17.17 1000 No
in 2025
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
29th
Ecuador rank
27th

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Ecuador
05101520200120132025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 17.17 1000 No against 16.09 1000 No in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 1.08 1000 No.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ecuador ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 29th and Ecuador ranks 27th of 71 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Ecuador Difference Ahead
2000s 12.31 1000 No 13.57 1000 No 1.26 1000 No Ecuador
2010s 11.89 1000 No 16.13 1000 No 4.24 1000 No Ecuador
2020s 16.18 1000 No 14.62 1000 No 1.56 1000 No Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 17.17 1000 No against 16.09 1000 No in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2025.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
1.08 1000 No, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Ecuador rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 29th and Ecuador ranks 27th of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging — Male — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-male-value/bosnia-and-herzegovina/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-male-value/bosnia-and-herzegovina/ecuador/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Ecuador: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging — Male — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
78 places, 1,348 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.