Dominican Republic vs Mauritius: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging

Dominican Republic
0.99 1000 No
in 2024
Mauritius
0.46 1000 No
in 2024
Dominican Republic rank
65th
Mauritius rank
68th

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Mauritius
012345200020122024

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 0.99 1000 No against 0.46 1000 No in Mauritius, a difference of 0.53 1000 No.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 2.2 times Mauritius's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Mauritius ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 65th and Mauritius ranks 68th of 71 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 3.78 1000 No 1.18 1000 No 2.6 1000 No Dominican Republic
2010s 2.96 1000 No 0.5 1000 No 2.46 1000 No Dominican Republic
2020s 1.53 1000 No 0.3533 1000 No 1.18 1000 No Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging, Dominican Republic or Mauritius?
Dominican Republic, at 0.99 1000 No against 0.46 1000 No in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging between Dominican Republic and Mauritius?
0.53 1000 No, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Mauritius?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Dominican Republic and Mauritius rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging?
Dominican Republic ranks 65th and Mauritius ranks 68th of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Dominican Republic vs Mauritius: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-value/dominican-republic/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-value/dominican-republic/mauritius/">Dominican Republic vs Mauritius: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
78 places, 1,365 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.