Greece vs Lithuania, Republic of: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging

Greece
8.52 1000 No
in 2024
Lithuania, Republic of
7.25 1000 No
in 2024
Greece rank
42nd
Lithuania, Republic of rank
43rd

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging over time

  • Greece
  • Lithuania, Republic of
2.557.51012.515199320082024

How they compare

Greece currently reports 8.52 1000 No against 7.25 1000 No in Lithuania, Republic of, a difference of 1.27 1000 No.

That makes Greece's figure about 1.2 times Lithuania, Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Lithuania, Republic of ahead.

Greece ranks 42nd and Lithuania, Republic of ranks 43rd of 71 countries.

Lithuania, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Lithuania, Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 8.38 1000 No 13.02 1000 No 4.63 1000 No Lithuania, Republic of
2000s 6.06 1000 No 10.09 1000 No 4.03 1000 No Lithuania, Republic of
2010s 4.48 1000 No 11.89 1000 No 7.41 1000 No Lithuania, Republic of
2020s 6.05 1000 No 8.67 1000 No 2.61 1000 No Lithuania, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging, Greece or Lithuania, Republic of?
Greece, at 8.52 1000 No against 7.25 1000 No in Lithuania, Republic of as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging between Greece and Lithuania, Republic of?
1.27 1000 No, with Greece ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Lithuania, Republic of?
27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
How do Greece and Lithuania, Republic of rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging?
Greece ranks 42nd and Lithuania, Republic of ranks 43rd of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greece vs Lithuania, Republic of: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-value/greece/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-value/greece/lithuania/">Greece vs Lithuania, Republic of: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
78 places, 1,365 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.