Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Myanmar: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging

Iran (Islamic Republic of)
14.3 1000 No
in 2024
Myanmar
169.61 1000 No
in 2020
Iran (Islamic Republic of) rank
4th
Myanmar rank
4th

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging over time

  • Iran (Islamic Republic of)
  • Myanmar
050100150200250200820162024

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 169.61 1000 No against 14.3 1000 No in Iran (Islamic Republic of), a difference of 155.31 1000 No.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 11.9 times Iran (Islamic Republic of)'s.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 4th and Myanmar ranks 4th of 5 groups.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iran (Islamic Republic of) Myanmar Difference Ahead
2010s 20.79 1000 No 161.84 1000 No 141.06 1000 No Myanmar
2020s 17.93 1000 No 169.61 1000 No 151.68 1000 No Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging, Iran (Islamic Republic of) or Myanmar?
Myanmar, at 169.61 1000 No against 14.3 1000 No in Iran (Islamic Republic of) as of 2020.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging between Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Myanmar?
155.31 1000 No, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Myanmar?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
How do Iran (Islamic Republic of) and Myanmar rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging?
Iran (Islamic Republic of) ranks 4th and Myanmar ranks 4th of 5 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Myanmar: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-value/iran-islamic-republic-of/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-value/iran-islamic-republic-of/myanmar/">Iran (Islamic Republic of) vs Myanmar: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
78 places, 1,365 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.