Mexico vs Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of): ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging

Mexico
200.88 1000 No
in 2024
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
3.29 1000 No
in 2017
Mexico rank
3rd
Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) rank
5th

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging over time

  • Mexico
  • Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)
050100150200200520142024

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 200.88 1000 No against 3.29 1000 No in Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), a difference of 197.59 1000 No.

That makes Mexico's figure about 61.1 times Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)'s.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Mexico ranks 3rd and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) ranks 5th of 71 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mexico Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) Difference Ahead
2000s 137.69 1000 No 7.41 1000 No 130.27 1000 No Mexico
2010s 145.35 1000 No 5.91 1000 No 139.44 1000 No Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging, Mexico or Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)?
Mexico, at 200.88 1000 No against 3.29 1000 No in Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging between Mexico and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)?
197.59 1000 No, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of)?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2017.
How do Mexico and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging?
Mexico ranks 3rd and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) ranks 5th of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mexico vs Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of): ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-value/mexico/venezuela-bolivarian-republic-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-value/mexico/venezuela-bolivarian-republic-of/">Mexico vs Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of): ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
78 places, 1,365 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.