Myanmar vs United States of America: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging

Myanmar
169.61 1000 No
in 2020
United States of America
140.87 1000 No
in 2025
Myanmar rank
4th
United States of America rank
1st

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging over time

  • Myanmar
  • United States of America
050100150200250200320142025

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 169.61 1000 No against 140.87 1000 No in United States of America, a difference of 28.74 1000 No.

That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.2 times United States of America's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Myanmar ahead.

Myanmar ranks 4th and United States of America ranks 1st of 71 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 1 and United States of America in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar United States of America Difference Ahead
2010s 161.84 1000 No 190.91 1000 No 29.06 1000 No United States of America
2020s 169.61 1000 No 154.84 1000 No 14.77 1000 No Myanmar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging, Myanmar or United States of America?
Myanmar, at 169.61 1000 No against 140.87 1000 No in United States of America as of 2020.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging between Myanmar and United States of America?
28.74 1000 No, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and United States of America?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
How do Myanmar and United States of America rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — employment in forestry and logging?
Myanmar ranks 4th and United States of America ranks 1st of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs United States of America: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-value/myanmar/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-value/myanmar/united-states-of-america/">Myanmar vs United States of America: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Employment in forestry and logging — Value
Unit
1000 No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
78 places, 1,365 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.