Mauritius vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in forestry and

Mauritius
1.59 %
in 2024
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1.63 %
in 2024
Mauritius rank
49th
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
48th

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in forestry and over time

  • Mauritius
  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
0.511.522.53199320082024

How they compare

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 1.63 % against 1.59 % in Mauritius, a difference of 0.04 %.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 49th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 48th of 71 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Difference Ahead
2000s 2.29 % 0.8425 % 1.44 % Mauritius
2010s 1.29 % 1.18 % 0.115 % Mauritius
2020s 1.25 % 1.46 % 0.2133 % Netherlands (Kingdom of the)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in forestry and, Mauritius or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 1.63 % against 1.59 % in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in forestry and between Mauritius and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
0.04 %, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
13 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in forestry and?
Mauritius ranks 49th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 48th of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in forestry and logging — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in forestry and. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-share-of-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-value/mauritius/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-share-of-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-value/mauritius/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Mauritius vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in forestry and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in forestry and logging — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
78 places, 1,289 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.