Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Thailand: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in forestry and

Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1.63 %
in 2024
Thailand
1.37 %
in 2024
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
48th
Thailand rank
50th

ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in forestry and over time

  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
  • Thailand
0.511.52199320082024

How they compare

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 1.63 % against 1.37 % in Thailand, a difference of 0.26 %.

That makes Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s figure about 1.2 times Thailand's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Thailand ahead.

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 48th and Thailand ranks 50th of 71 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Thailand Difference Ahead
2010s 1.18 % 1.36 % 0.1867 % Thailand
2020s 1.64 % 1.39 % 0.256 % Netherlands (Kingdom of the)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in forestry and, Netherlands (Kingdom of the) or Thailand?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 1.63 % against 1.37 % in Thailand as of 2024.
What is the difference in ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in forestry and between Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Thailand?
0.26 %, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Thailand?
11 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
How do Netherlands (Kingdom of the) and Thailand rank globally for ilostat - labour force survey — share of employment in forestry and?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 48th and Thailand ranks 50th of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in forestry and logging — Value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Thailand: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in forestry and. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-share-of-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-value/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/ilostat-labour-force-survey-share-of-employment-in-forestry-and-logging-value/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/thailand/">Netherlands (Kingdom of the) vs Thailand: ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in forestry and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
ILOSTAT - Labour force survey — Share of employment in forestry and logging — Value
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
78 places, 1,289 data points, 1992–2025
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT Employment indicators domain focuses on indicators related to employment in agrifood systems and rural areas. The update is performed yearly, using data from the International Labour Organization (ILO) database that contains a rich set of indicators from a wide range of topics related to labour statistics. The indicators published in FAOSTAT are derived from the labour force statistics (LFS) and rural and urban labour markets (RURURB) databases of the ILOSTAT database. In addition, the ILO modelled estimates and projections (ILOEST) are used to provide information on employment in agriculture. FAOSTAT also publishes indicators on employment in agrifood systems (AFS) from 2000 at the national, regional, and global levels, using a methodology developed by the FAO to estimate the number of people employed within these systems.