Cape Verde vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Imported deforestation
Cape Verde
0 hectares
in 2017
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0 hectares
in 2011
Cape Verde rank
156th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
156th
Imported deforestation over time
- Cape Verde
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 156th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 156th of 178 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imported deforestation, Cape Verde or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Cape Verde, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2017.
- What is the difference in imported deforestation between Cape Verde and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0 hectares, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for imported deforestation?
- Cape Verde ranks 156th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 156th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Imported deforestation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imported deforestation is the amount of deforestation in other countries that is driven by the production of food and forestry products that are imported. This is measured in hectares.