Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Suriname: Imported deforestation
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0 hectares
in 2011
Suriname
0 hectares
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
156th
Suriname rank
156th
Imported deforestation over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Suriname
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Suriname, a difference of 0 hectares.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 156th and Suriname ranks 156th of 178 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
| 2010s | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | 0 hectares | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher imported deforestation, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Suriname?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0 hectares against 0 hectares in Suriname as of 2011.
- What is the difference in imported deforestation between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Suriname?
- 0 hectares, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Suriname?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Suriname rank globally for imported deforestation?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 156th and Suriname ranks 156th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Imported deforestation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imported deforestation is the amount of deforestation in other countries that is driven by the production of food and forestry products that are imported. This is measured in hectares.